[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Question: Why does KMFilterActionMove::process() for
From:       Marc Mutz <Marc.Mutz () uni-bielefeld ! de>
Date:       2001-04-26 14:12:07
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 25 April 2001 19:15, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Thursday 26 April 2001 07:11, Marc Mutz wrote:
<snip>
> The example looks like filters can be named, mmmm, I remember some
> debates about that, will be interesting to see how that works.
<snip>

Filters are auto-named as before until you explicitely rename them. The 
parameter which decides whether the explicit renaming has already 
happened, is: Does the filter name match /^</?

> Would be nice if the "Match all of the following" and "Match any of
> the following" radio buttons could be place side by side.
<snip>

I don't think that this will look good. Any opinions from the others?

> > Do you think using toolbuttons for 'up' , 'down', 'new', 'delete'
> > and 'rename' would be OK?
>
> Yes, maybe ask Torsten.
<snip>

Sorry for being ignorant, but who's that?

Marc

-- 
Marc Mutz <Marc@Mutz.com>
http://marc.mutz.com/
http://www.mathematik.uni-bielefeld.de/~mmutz/
http://EncryptionHOWTO.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]