From kmail-devel Mon Apr 16 14:38:52 2001 From: Guillaume Laurent Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:38:52 +0000 To: kmail-devel Subject: Re: PATCH : scoring, take 2 X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=98743260005930 On Monday 16 April 2001 15:49, Don Sanders wrote: > I don't want to see any slow down at all. Scores should only be computed > for visible items using the virtual methods text and pixmap. That ways > scoring should be free when not sorting by score. But I don't see how sorting by score would still work in that case... > Also this way you prevent > memory bloat too. See Sam's patch for how that should work. Is it in CVS ? > People already complain that KMail takes too much memory, and I am working > really hard to sped it up too. > > When sorting by score (if that's possible) is sounds like things will be > pretty slow. I've tried it on a moderately large folder and it worked just fine... Then again I have a PIII 600 so I prefer to rely on other's comments regarding speed. > BTW Guillaume I'm sorry about editing kmheaders under you and no doubt > causing conflicts that have to be merged. No problem. :-) -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org _______________________________________________ Kmail Developers mailing list Kmail@master.kde.org http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail