On Sunday  8 April 2001 16:28, Don Sanders wrote:
> > At least I think, that the automatic naming does the job very well and I
> > consider it unneccessary time wasting, if I have to invent a name for
> > every filter rule now, only because a few users absulutely want their own
> > names. And I have a lot of filter rules. Only because Netscape allows
> > naming of filter rules is for me no argument, that this feature is also
> > required in KMail. If you really want to allow changing the name, then
> > the automatic naming should still work, as long the user does not change
> > the name manually. Also I think, I'm not the only one with this opinion
> > on this list, as this issue was discussed some months ago.
>
> I agree with Michael here. As I pretty much always do (if I don't say
> anything then it can be assumed I agree with Michael by default).
>
> The earlier filter dialog suggestions made were very good though.

I would like to see this added to kmail.  So Michael's proposal to have 
"automatic naming should still work" and the ability to change the filter 
name would be very good.

-- 
Richard Bos
For those who have no (/)home the journey is endless
_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail