[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Bug#9466: marked as done (Kmail logo for fancy headers is a bit ugly)
From:       owner () bugs ! kde ! org (Stephan Kulow)
Date:       2000-08-31 9:03:04
[Download RAW message or body]

Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:53:28 +0200
with message-id <00083110525900.13216@michael>
and subject line Bug#9466: Kmail logo for fancy headers is a bit ugly
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Stephan Kulow
(administrator, KDE bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.kde.org; 30 Aug 2000 15:11:33 +0000
From claudiuc@metropolis.esential.ro Wed Aug 30 17:11:33 2000
Received: from [212.93.133.159] ([212.93.133.159]:57867 "EHLO
        metropolis.esential.ro") by master.kde.org with ESMTP
        id <S222210AbQH3PKj>; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:10:39 +0200
Received: (from claudiuc@localhost)
        by metropolis.esential.ro (8.10.2/8.10.2) id e7UFCZe09084;
        Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:12:35 +0300
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:12:35 +0300
From:   Claudiu Costin <claudiuc@metropolis.esential.ro>
Message-Id: <200008301512.e7UFCZe09084@metropolis.esential.ro>
To:     submit@bugs.kde.org
Subject: Kmail logo for fancy headers is a bit ugly
Return-Path: <claudiuc@metropolis.esential.ro>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;submit@bugs.kde.org

Package: kmail
Version: 1.1.90 (KDE 1.93 Beta >= 20000813)
Severity: wishlist

Kmail logo for fancy headers is a bit ugly.
Don't you think that for KDE2 will be more 
nice a beaty set of wheels?

Sorry if you feel touched. But I want all good
for KDE look and feel (and stability :)

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]