[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: New config dialog
From:       "Robert D. Williams" <rwilliams () jrc-utah ! com>
Date:       2000-03-17 9:14:08
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Espen Sand wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Don Sanders wrote:
> > >The new config dialog looks good. Espen thanks for fixing up kmheaders.h
> > > and for checking in the new config dialog in such away that nothing
> > > else was broken.
> >
> > Doesn't everybody do it like that? :)
> >
> > >One thing that bears thinking about is the fact that users will be
> > > required to click twice to access some tabs whereas before they only
> > > had to click once. I guess the common options should be easily
> > > accessible (long folder list for instance).
> >
> > Well perhaps. I want to keep the dialog as small as possible (this issue
> > should never be forgotten). Besides, the dialog will almost never be used
> > or at least seldom so I don't an extra click is that important here.
> >
> > Anyway, we can/should rearrange the tabs so that the most frequently used
> > are the  first on each page.
>
> Yes exactly speed isn't important, just the popular options should be easy
> to find for KMail newbies. Actually I'm thinking long folder list should be
> on by default (didn't someone else say that?) so perhaps there wouldn't be
> a problem in that case.

I think it was me ;-)  We need long folder list as the default.   So much 
better than the alternative.


> Hmm, that make me wonder does anyone use short folder list? Speak now or
> forever hold your peace :-)
>
> BFN,
> Don.

-- 
Robert Williams       rwilliams@jrc-utah.com
Jarob Consulting      rwilliams@kde.org
Provo, Utah           rwilliams71@excite.com
USA

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]