[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    PGP (Fwd & Re: KMail Development)
From:       Andreas Gungl <Andreas.Gungl () osp-dd ! de>
Date:       2000-02-02 6:22:29
[Download RAW message or body]

John Aldrich schrieb:
> 
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wrote PGP 6.x integration for kmail. Don Sanders commited my changes
> > to CVS in the last days. Did you check your problems against the
> > lastest version?
> > If there are still any problems (and I think so), please let me know.
> >
> > BTW, I didn't see the "bug" mentioned by John all over the time I
> > used kmail (1.0.28 patched / 1.1.3x) together with pgp 6.x. I just
> > wanted to reproduce the "bug", but everything is working like
> > expected. Some more info available (kmail version, pgp version, ...)?
> >
> I'm using 1.0.28 under RedHat 6.0 here at work. PGP version
> is 5.0 on this machine.... At home, I've got 6.0.xx. which,
> of course, doesn't work with KMail 1.0.28. At home my
> machine is Mandrake 6.0.

I'm not sure, but I don't think, that the distribution is relevant for
pgp integration in kmail. At home you're using pgp 6.0.x?
I'm using kmail 1.0.28 (original from KDE 1.1.2) with pgp 2.6.3 at work
(SuSE 6.1), and at home I'm using kmail 1.0.28 (patched by myself) as
well as kmail 1.1.33 with pgp 6.x (SuSE 6.3).

I didn't care for pgp 5.0 when I wrote my enhancements. But pgp 2.6.3
and 6.x have some things in common. So I had a look at both versions.

If you want, I'll send you the files needed to add pgp 6.x support to
kmail 1.0.28 when I'm at home. (They are kpgp and kpgpbase - both header
and source files.) Just rebuild the program - that's all.
 
> One thing I noticed is that if I have a "non-blank"
> signature file and I try to PGP sign a message here at work
> with RedHat 6.0 and KMail 1.0.28, it SAYS it's signing the
> message, but when I get it back, the entire message is
> duplicated where the signature should be...
>         John

Maybe, this is only with pgp 5.0? I don't have a mashine with pgp 5.0
installed on it. But I can have a look at the source, if there has been
some changes in pgp 5.0 support between kmail version 1.0.28 and 1.1.33.
If there are none, we should try to fix that problem.

Andreas

(For all who are wondering about two different e-mail addresses in my
mails:
I'm using a.gungl@gmx.de at home and Andreas.Gungl@osp-dd.de at work.)

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]