[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: spam toolbar icon
From:       Andreas Gungl <Andreas.Gungl () osp-dd ! de>
Date:       2007-01-12 8:19:49
Message-ID: 200701120919.49437 () osp-dd ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 19:46 schrieb Christian Schaarschmidt:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2007 20:44 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > On Sunday 07 January 2007 10:37, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > > Now let's say the user wants to mark all messages in a certain folder
> > > as non-spam. Let's furthermore say that some of those messages are
> > > already marked as non-spam. So the user selects all messages in the
> > > folder and then he clicks on the "mark as non-spam" icon.
> >
> > i think you're overcomplicating the issue here and trying for a
> > technically accurate solution where one isn't needed.
> >
> > if the button shows state between Spam and Not Spam then at worst the
> > user would have to click the button twice to get the state they want in
> > the case of multiple selections.
>
> I  have spamassassin with auto-learning disabled, all Ham is placed in my
> inbox without marking as Ham. The icons are used to train spamassassin
> and set the marker, so that I know which has been used to train
> spamassassin. I don't see how this could be done with only one button.
> I vote for two buttons.

Same pattern here. I've two actions to train the anti-spam tool 
(Spamassassin in my case). Having one icon makes no sense. Additionally, 
the marked messages need different icons. One could even argue we need 
another icon for messages classified as "unsure" as some anti-spam tools 
detect three states.

Andreas
_______________________________________________
KMail developers mailing list
KMail-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]