[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Procmail -> directly into kmail
From:       Gene Heskett <gene.heskett () verizon ! net>
Date:       2006-02-04 3:20:17
Message-ID: 200602032220.17931.gene.heskett () verizon ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 03 February 2006 17:48, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:09, Thomas Beinicke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After encountering so many crashes with kmail and my imap server on
>> startup I thought about sending my mails directly into ~/Mail via
>> procmail.
>>
>> This seems to work to a certain degree.
>> I have encountered two problems. The first problem is that there is
>> no periodic check so kmail won't show me if I have got a new mail
>> and another problem is that everytime I receive a new mail in my
>> inbox all mails in there are marked as unread.
>>
>> Is anyone else using the same setup? Is this setup possible at all?
>> If not do you have any other suggestions?
>
>http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/kdepim/kmail/faq.html#faq-procmail
>
>Regards,
>Ingo

Hi Ingo;

The above link could be more helpfull if we could find a procmail recipe 
to have it run the SA check independantly from the current pipeing 
being done in the kmail filter setting.  I think I could have fetchmail 
deliver to a different mailbox file, & have procmail do the SA checks 
and deliver it to the kmail input box as fetchmail is currently doing 
so all kmail would have to do is sort according to its filter rules, 
leaving kmail a heck of a lot snappier.

SA takes so much cpu away from the kmail composer that its often frozen 
in time for 10 seconds or more at a time, several times during each and 
every 10 minute mail suck.

If we could move that to procmail, maybe we'ed get kmail back among the 
living instead of feeling we're haveing to charge the paddles & give it 
a useless shot 2 or 4 times while just typing this message.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules.  I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
_______________________________________________
KMail developers mailing list
KMail-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]