On Thursday 24 November 2005 02:02, Andreas Gungl wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 23. November 2005 16:17 schrieb Carsten Burghardt:
> > Andreas Gungl sagte:
> > > To fix that bug, I don't intend to enable anything which isn't
> > > enabled ATM.
> > > Instead I'll try to fix what is allowed currently as I consider
> > > it wasting time to extend the decision matrix for allowed
> > > folder movements.
> >
> > What if we disallow moving of subfolders (for all kinds of) and
> > implement this for 4.0? The logic itself is the same for all
> > folder types.
>
> Fine with me. Although it's uncomfortable, it's at least safe.

Maybe the safe route is best for the moment. Sorry I didn't have time 
to help Andreas. I'm struggling to find the time to look into 
numerous issues myself.

Don Sanders.
_______________________________________________
KMail developers mailing list
KMail-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel