[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: pinentry-kde (Re: Wallet support for KMail)
From:       Martijn Klingens <klingens () kde ! org>
Date:       2005-02-25 17:06:45
Message-ID: 200502251806.45840.klingens () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 24 February 2005 17:18, Volker Krause wrote:
> I'm mostly interested in KWallet support and would be willing to help with
> this.

Ok, that helps. Not that adding KWallet support is exactly hard (I've done it 
before ;-) ), but more eyes still help writing good code.

The more fundamental problem of how to approach the whole thing is not solved 
though.

I'm not very happy with the thought of forking the Qt-pinentry, since it puts 
the burden of syncing upstream updates upon us. Does anyone have a better 
idea of dealing with this? Ingo: since you know the GPA people longer and 
better than I do, is there any chance of them cooperating in one way or 
another by providing e.g. a shared lib or something else that helps us reduce 
code duplication and maintenance? Is there any chance of the pinentry shared 
code having BC status in the first place? I don't dare asking myself after 
the debacle of the previous pinentry-kde in late 2003...

-- 
Martijn
_______________________________________________
KMail developers mailing list
KMail-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]