[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kmail-devel
Subject: [Bug 94170] New: default 'reply' option should fallback to 'reply
From: Bernd Wurst <bugzilla () bernd-wurst ! de>
Date: 2004-11-30 16:54:23
Message-ID: 20041130175421.94170.bugzilla () bernd-wurst ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94170
Summary: default 'reply' option should fallback to 'reply to all'
instead of 'reply to sender'
Product: kmail
Version: unspecified
Platform: Gentoo Packages
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
Priority: NOR
Component: general
AssignedTo: kmail-devel kde org
ReportedBy: bugzilla bernd-wurst de
Version: (using KDE KDE 3.3.1)
Installed from: Gentoo Packages
I don't think that everybody will agree to this but I thought a while about it and I like the \
idea... :-)
Anyway, I found out that KMail has a usability-problem for power-users.
When using mutt, one simply has to press 'g' for 'group reply' to answer all daily mail. \
Mail-Followup-To is used (and so are mailing lists with other power-users that set this header \
field), simple mail is replyed normally, 'cc-parties' can be done with this. To achive these \
three cases in KMail, one has to press different buttons. 'reply to all' can not respect \
Mail-Followup-To because only the 'reply to list' function is there for this. On the other \
hand, 'reply to list' cannot work with simple messages because if no list is detected, an empty \
recipient field is set.
So there is an pseudo-intelligent 'reply' feature, that chooses 'reply to list' if a list is \
found and 'reply to sender' if not. This behaviour breaks 'cc-parties' because 'reply to \
sender' throws out all cc-field entries. This could be fixed if 'reply' would not fall back to \
'reply to sender' but to 'reply to all'.
After thinking about this for a while, I could not find any disadvatages of that.
There should be no change if one replies on single mail messages (if reply-to is handled \
correctly).
This improvement would make two things better in this world:
1. power users would only have to use *one single* reply function for (nearly) all mail \
messages 2. other KMail users would respect Cc entries set by the original poster. :)
Additionaly: mutt implements 'Mail-Followup-To'-handling in 'group reply' (which is 'reply to \
all') and does not provide an option to reply to *really all* mentioned addresses. The proposed \
solution for KMail would make it possible to do both. As long as I can see, KMail doesn't make \
a difference between 'reply to mailing list' and 'use Mail-Followup-to', but that's not a \
problem (for me). _______________________________________________
KMail developers mailing list
KMail-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic