--===============2078043756== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2855660.paJTBs5qst"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart2855660.paJTBs5qst Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 31 August 2004 10:52, Don Sanders wrote: > There are still a few areas of contention that I can see. However I'm > glad because I think I can proceed with implementing this design and > reconsider these areas of contention at a later date. > > The areas of possible contention I'm concerned with are: > 1) Whether filters should be applied by default to IMAP accounts. > > I think this makes sense for new IMAP accounts, but I don't want to > automatically change behavior for existing IMAP accounts. The best solution is probably to ask the user after the creation of a=20 new IMAP account: "Should new messages for this account be filtered?" > 2) Operating on multiple filters simultaneously. > > I see how this advanced tab design gives an 'overview about the > status of all accounts' for a particular filter. But there is still > the problem of existing IMAP users who (currently manually apply > filters but) want to use filters on incoming mail. It would be > preferable if they didn't have to iterate through each filter > toggling on the 'Apply for all accounts' checkbox. It could be made possible to change multiple filters (i.e. all selected=20 filters) at once. Of course, this means we are back to tri-state. Maybe=20 the tri-state is better displayed by a combobox with three entries than=20 with a checkbox. Regards, Ingo --nextPart2855660.paJTBs5qst Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBNNeYGnR+RTDgudgRAsdWAJ0XEsAvf6e0paYwlArsNLZXHc/KvwCgl5LT ne37g10YL1xfVJiNAM79zb8= =39ZI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2855660.paJTBs5qst-- --===============2078043756== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ KMail developers mailing list KMail-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel --===============2078043756==--