[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    [Bug 86090] kmail virus scan not working
From:       Udo <svomb () gmx ! net>
Date:       2004-07-28 18:29:22
Message-ID: 20040728182922.12386.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
      
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86090      




------- Additional Comments From svomb gmx net  2004-07-28 20:29 -------
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 09:20 schrieb Andreas Gungl:
>
> Well, at least I have to change the mktemp call in CVS before I close this
> report. I wonder if it's worth changing the X-Virus-Flag: content too,
> because this way it contains more detailed information for the user in case
> he wants to track the result beyond a simple "yes" or "no".

Ok, I am a simple user only. For me it is fine and absolutely sufficient to
filter according to the test result "yes" or "no".

I believe that further differentiation is necessary amd meaningful only 
if you are planning a gui where you can select options like scan only,
disinfect, etc.

As I stated above, for me as an user the yes/no criteria is sufficient.

Udo
_______________________________________________
KMail developers mailing list
KMail-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]