From kmail-devel Mon Jun 21 15:10:26 2004 From: Karl-Heinz Zimmer Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:10:26 +0000 To: kmail-devel Subject: Huston, we have a problem: Q_UINT32 vs. unsigned long Message-Id: <200406211710.28448 () postmaster ! bugcops ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=108783066919122 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, just found that we are using a Q_UINT32 as return value of MessageProperty::serialChache() while we are using a simple "unsigned int" as parameter in nearly all of the messages working with the serNum, e.g. in KMMsgBase::getSerNum() and in many more of them. Sad to say I am in a terrible hurry to match a deadline so there is no chance I can dig into the code to trace all ways the serial numbers go and adjust them accordingly. But still: The issue is dangerous, it may break on 64bit machines. Who is able and has the time to solve this issue? Karl-Heinz - -- Karl-Heinz Zimmer I n d e V i e w K D E Föhren Presentations Beyond Limitations Conquer your Desktop www.fiehr.de www.indeview.org www.kde.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA1vpiCcaVnbvggDcRAp1yAJ40y6knh/4jd2Utwe5qFEphDMmHzACfTty9 zaxSJ3Za8CsYnirzbHgIgFE= =cbri -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ KMail developers mailing list KMail-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel