[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Search Dialog
From:       Don Sanders <sanders () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-01-07 1:11:38
Message-ID: 200401071111.38982.sanders () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 06 January 2004 17:47, Andreas Gungl wrote:
> Am Tuesday 06 January 2004 04:33 schrieb Don Sanders:
> > On Tuesday 06 January 2004 09:03, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > Don wrote:
> > > > Maybe it would be better to discuss this kind of think after
> > > > the 3.2 release, I'm not willing to test new code before
> > > > then.
> > >
> > > I did not intend otherwise.
> >
> > Understandable comment. I can see that you do not agree with my
> > position. I'm not a fan of default right of veto, and you can
> > overrule my objection and commit changes I object to with the
> > support of Ingo and at least one other core developer.
>
> Please let's wait some days until 3.2 is out. It's not about ruling
> out anybody, it's about making the interface easier and better
> looking.
>
> As I had already expressed in another mail, I don't think the
> current dialog is easy to understand. I'm for the changes suggested
> by Till and I would like to see more founded proposals like the one
> of Thomas. BTW, it's very seldom that we get such constructive
> proposals - it's not wise to block to those contributors.
>
> I for myself like the outfit provided in the screenshot. It groups
> the controls better. I've a problem with the "I'm an expert"
> checkbox, too. But this can be dicussed enough for the next
> release.

I don't have the power to block anyone's changes. As long as Thomas 
adheres to the KMail commitpolicy, like everyone else, I'm fine with 
him contributing.

As list admin I'd like this thread to stop now.

Don.
_______________________________________________
KMail developers mailing list
KMail-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]