From kmail-devel Sun Nov 30 16:42:58 2003 From: Ingo =?iso-8859-15?q?Kl=F6cker?= Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:42:58 +0000 To: kmail-devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Reply behavior in KMail X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=107021062623462 On Sunday 30 November 2003 17:04, Martin Koller wrote: > Writing this mail b clicking on the "reply" button ... > > > Sure. But this criticism is mostly based on two things: > > a) There was no Reply to Mailing-list icon on the default toolbar. > > b) People didn't know about Reply to Mailing-list (mainly due to > > a)). > > > > a) has been fixed by me in the meantime. So everone updating to KDE > > 3.2 will notice the new icon, wonder why it's there, notice that > > Reply doesn't work anymore as before and start using Reply to > > Mailing-list (what they should have been using all the time for > > replying to mailing-list messages). > > Hmm... I upgraded to 3.2 yesterday (used 3.1.4 before), and I'm > currently using kontact, but I have no new icon in my iconbar ... Well, I added the icon yesterday at 16:42 CET. > And if I try to "reply" to your mail, the To: address is not really > different from the "Reply to mailing list" > > Reply gives: kmail@kde.org > Reply to mailing list gives: kmail@mail.kde.org > > I'm not a specialist what all the email headers concerns, but can you > tell me, if that is correct, and if so, what's the difference? That's most likely because you entered kmail@mail.kde.org as the mailing-list post address for you KMail folder. KMail compares this address to the one that's in the Reply-To: header (which is kmail@kde.org) and since they are different KMail currently doesn't recognize kmail@kde.org as mailing-list address and uses this address for Reply to Sender. I guess we'll have to remove both, the user provided email address and the List-Post address from the Reply-to before we consider the value of the Reply-to header for Reply to Sender. Especially with the KDE mailing-lists which all have two different addresses so that the user might have entered the "wrong" one in the folder configuration this seems to be necessary. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Regards, Ingo _______________________________________________ KMail Developers mailing list kmail@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail