On Friday 19 September 2003 23:06 pm, Ingo Klöcker wrote:

> > >
> > > I still would prefer doing HTML editing together with the kompose
> > > framework Zack is working on for post 3.2. But I first would have
> > > to see this in action.
> >
> > The Kompose framework won't magically implement HTML support, someone
> > still has to do that work, the tasks are somewhat orthogonal.
> 
> True. But I guess that most of the work to put HTML support into 
> KMComposer will be done again in order to add HTML support to some 
> Komposer plugin. Or does the HTML support not heavily rely on the 
> underlying KEdit (which is based on some long deprecated Qt class) and 
> on the current layout handling in KMComposer?
> I'm not saying that the work should be stopped. But I'm pretty sure that 
> most of the work will not be portable to the Komposer framework so that 
> then the work will have to start from scratch. Anyway, if I'm wrong 
> with this assumption then just ignore me. ;-)
I'm trying to implement HTML editing support, but as far as I can see now, it 
has very little to do with KEdit. It only gets the html message from  KEdit.

Regards,
Edwin
_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail