From kmail-devel Fri Sep 19 21:06:10 2003 From: Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:06:10 +0000 To: kmail-devel Subject: Re: little reminder on the 3.2 release schedule X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=106400568531374 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============2268182425657268==" --===============2268182425657268== Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_K/2a/vH5MO3HeIQ"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Boundary-02=_K/2a/vH5MO3HeIQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 19 September 2003 04:38, Don Sanders wrote: > On Thursday 18 September 2003 21:55, Stephan Kulow wrote: > > On Thursday 18 September 2003 10:17, Don Sanders wrote: > > > Moving onto HTML editing. There's a working (but buggy) HTML > > > editing patch now implemented. It hasn't required any major > > > rewriting of code, so hopefully it doesn't open a can of worms > > > and hopefully fixing the remaining bugs doesn't require any major > > > rewriting. Someone else is helping with this now, so maybe it'll > > > only require two weeks effort on my part. > > > > I still would prefer doing HTML editing together with the kompose > > framework Zack is working on for post 3.2. But I first would have > > to see this in action. > > The Kompose framework won't magically implement HTML support, someone > still has to do that work, the tasks are somewhat orthogonal. True. But I guess that most of the work to put HTML support into=20 KMComposer will be done again in order to add HTML support to some=20 Komposer plugin. Or does the HTML support not heavily rely on the=20 underlying KEdit (which is based on some long deprecated Qt class) and=20 on the current layout handling in KMComposer? I'm not saying that the work should be stopped. But I'm pretty sure that=20 most of the work will not be portable to the Komposer framework so that=20 then the work will have to start from scratch. Anyway, if I'm wrong=20 with this assumption then just ignore me. ;-) > Outlook is fond of sending Multipart/Related messages, or at least it > used to be. It's important for communicating with Outlook users. Yeah. I really would like to be able to see all those spam messages in=20 all their beauty. ;-) I guess I just don't know enough Outlook users=20 because I never ever received a multipart/related message which wasn't=20 spam. > > > So I have 8 weeks / 64 hours of work todo. I'm not sure but I > > > might be able to get it done by the October 21. That is assuming > > > that I can actually get my code into cvs, that it isn't veto'd > > > and that before that date no serious bugs are found, or > > > introduced in the features I've already committed. Which makes me > > > wonder about your finding a new crash every day comment, because > > > I'm simply not seeing regular reports of crashes in the features > > > I've implemented thus far. > > > > Because Till and I try to tackle the bugs right away :) > > That's nice, but please remember what I'm not told about I don't know > about. Don, you should really relax a bit. It's not as if you would have to fix=20 each and every bug in KMail. You should really put some trust in your=20 fellow developers and you shouldn't take all complaints about the=20 "buggy" KMail too serious. After all we are using KMail HEAD all the=20 time, so it really can't be that broken. Regards, Ingo --Boundary-02=_K/2a/vH5MO3HeIQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/a2/KGnR+RTDgudgRAj5aAKC1Yp3dHmnEyWmQffI4J6TOJ0yexwCfY13v wxfL6w2wBYQsMKzqEFKX60Q= =Cx3c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_K/2a/vH5MO3HeIQ-- --===============2268182425657268== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ KMail Developers mailing list kmail@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail --===============2268182425657268==--