From kmail-devel  Thu Sep 18 22:05:44 2003
From: Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 22:05:44 +0000
To: kmail-devel
Subject: Re: little reminder on the 3.2 release schedule
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=106392291718257
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============13962436831037106=="


--===============13962436831037106==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_/wia/Pw25e6T/dE";
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--Boundary-02=_/wia/Pw25e6T/dE
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 18 September 2003 13:55, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> On Thursday 18 September 2003 10:17, Don Sanders wrote:
> I'd close bugs like 54886 as FIXED - people can reopen bugs that are
> not fixed. But problems with kregexp are invalid as we don't use it
> anymore.

We are still using KRegExp3 in kmfilteraction.cpp. The last time I=20
checked it made sense that we still use it because the=20
KRegExp3::replace method has a feature which QRegExp doesn't provide=20
(AFAIK).

> > Looking at normal bugs, none of them strike me as being that
> > important except for Bug:41514 "KMail freezes the UI when checking
> > for new mail". With 631 votes it seem to be the most hated bug in
> > KDE. This is a complicated issue but one of the main problems seems
> > to be blocking actions, specifically piping through spamassassin.
>
> And GPG. And NFS :)

Did someone mention GPG? GPG is of course not related to 41514 because=20
the GPG freezes don't happen when KMail is checking for new mail. ;-)=20
Anyway, I wished I had more time.

> > KOrganizer/KMail integration I really don't see as being difficult
> > from the KMail side given hidden dcop methods, one week should be
> > enough.
>
> That opens the question who is working on it. Cornelius, who got the
> hands full with kitchensync? Or Daniel, who got the hands full with
> kcontrol (hopefuly :)?
> If it all works as nicely as in #60575 I'm not seeing much of a
> problem really ;)

On the KMail side I should be working on this. Cornelius and I agreed=20
that I will write a plugin interface for dealing with message parts=20
(aka attachments) with certain mime types, e.g. invitations. The plugin=20
will create a HTML presentation of the message part with some special=20
links. If the user clicks on the links KMail will pass this information=20
to the plugin which should then do whatever is appropriate (e.g.=20
contact KOrganizer via DCOP).

> > Multipart/Related mails might have to slip to 3.3, which is a
> > shame.
>
> I thought that's part of the HTML editing? Anyway, I have no idea :)

Well, both are related (Muahahaha), but HTML works well without embedded=20
images. Of course, it would be silly if KMail could create multipart/
related but couldn't display it.

Regards,
Ingo

--Boundary-02=_/wia/Pw25e6T/dE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/aiw/GnR+RTDgudgRAq6LAKC9Lkc1MOQn2gS8XkzvaoyiBrf87ACgjojn
BAYYsc3w0c4VTYWQlXEEECM=
=lD9u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_/wia/Pw25e6T/dE--

--===============13962436831037106==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

--===============13962436831037106==--