On Wednesday 11 September 2002 16:32, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 September 2002 23:56, Michael Brade wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 September 2002 13:31, Don Sanders wrote:
> > > > Don't get me wrong, I would have nothing against Don as
> > > > maintainer if it is in public agreement but I really don't like
> > > > the way things are going right now (e.g. claiming
> > > > maintainership instead of asking for it).
> > >
> > > Well I'm really hurt by this.
> >
> > I'm sorry
>
> Not by your comment but by this dispute over ownership.
>
> I am not ready to make it public yet, but I have been working on a
> report that provides compelling evidence that I am the legitimate
> owner of the KMail package in HEAD.
>
> People on this list are not aware of all the details involved and they
> should reserve their judement until I present this evidence.
>
> In the mean time I would suggest people look at ESRs
> "Homesteading the Noosphere" paper to learn the basics about ownership
> of open source projects.

So you're spending your time to prove that you own KMail?
No, I don't know all these details and to be honest I don't give a ... for=
=20
that. I'm spending my sparetime to code for an opensource software that I u=
se=20
myself. That's it.

=2D-=20
Regards,

Carsten Burghardt
_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail