From kmail-devel Wed Sep 11 09:51:28 2002 From: Michael Brade Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:51:28 +0000 To: kmail-devel Subject: Re: Stuff I'm working on X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=103173798703691 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--Boundary-02=_jIxf9zOmLYp51aC" --Boundary-02=_jIxf9zOmLYp51aC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline Just to sneak in a thought I had when reading the discussion of this=20 unfortunate situation. On Tuesday 10 September 2002 19:45, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > this isn't the only option. there are several other options, most of whic= h=20 > include some variation of: > > [...] > o allowing branch to become HEAD eventually Yes, and this is exactly what Don wants, his aim he didn't talk about yet:= =20 _he_ is the current self-proclaimed maintainer of the branch and if it=20 becomes HEAD he will claim maintainership of KMail, this time with more=20 arguments than just "I am still the real one". Don't get me wrong, I would have nothing against Don as maintainer if it is= in=20 public agreement but I really don't like the way things are going right now= =20 (e.g. claiming maintainership instead of asking for it). =2D-=20 Michael Brade; KDE Developer, Student of Computer Science |-mail: echo brade !#|tr -d "c oh"|s\e\d 's/e/\@/2;s/$/.org/;s/bra/k/2' =B0--web: http://www.kde.org/people/michaelb.html KDE 3: The Next Generation in Desktop Experience --Boundary-02=_jIxf9zOmLYp51aC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.90 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9fxIjdK2tAWD5bo0RAmPnAJ0a3P9+LDm8nrRDRBuTsVTh6jQtKQCcCXiX +SehCRfdFtZI2RByrP9cX54= =qxvj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_jIxf9zOmLYp51aC-- _______________________________________________ KMail Developers mailing list kmail@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail