-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 10 September 2002 12:45, Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote:
> I am taking you seriously: IMHO The above says that you are willing
> to contribute something valuable by taking into account that there _is_
> the official KMail HEAD branch and that working on the branch would
> lead to difficulties at merge-time if the official HEAD were ignored
> during your branch planing and implementation.

exactly. thanks for being able to accurately interpret my obfuscated english 
(aka aaronisms ;)

>    Any technical issues might increase the gap between the make-it-cool
>    branch and KMail's official HEAD branch should be discussed not via
>    private mails but _in_public_ by posting your questions/suggestions
>    to this mailing list so the KMail core developers and the KMail
>    maintainer can read about it and comment in case they whish to do so.

sure... 

and just to make it clear: branch or no branch, i would've asked you in a 
private email first anyways =) i do realize that given the current tensions, 
that usual mode of behaviour should be alterred in the name of sensitivity

> I hope asking for this is not considered unpolite?

not at all... so, now... what's your answer to my question? 

- -- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
    - Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9flC/1rcusafx20MRAjS7AJ0Xl5dmd5h61IqWaQ92+isnI1nQlgCfaFXZ
dQXJrYE3cJcyuqFrzO8HrNU=
=6qwg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail