From kmail-devel Tue Sep 10 18:53:16 2002 From: Neil Stevens Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:53:16 +0000 To: kmail-devel Subject: Re: Stuff I'm working on X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=103168405525712 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday September 10, 2002 11:45, Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote: > On Tuesday 10 September 2002 20:10, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 September 2002 11:59, Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote: > > (...) > > > > Am I the only one understanding this the way that Don would _like_ > > > to 'have to' fork? > > > > i don't think anyone would LIKE to have a fork. if it become > > absolutely necessary, though, you will discover that some people are > > willing to support it. > > I am taking you seriously: IMHO The above says that you are willing > to contribute something valuable by taking into account that there _is_ > the official KMail HEAD branch and that working on the branch would > lead to difficulties at merge-time if the official HEAD were ignored > during your branch planing and implementation. What makes HEAD more "official" than any other branch? KDE releases aren't like some medieval monarchy, bequeathing some Divine Right on their applications. - -- Neil Stevens - neil@qualityassistant.com "I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left." - Margaret Thatcher -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9fj+cf7mnligQOmERApP4AJ4r69jLniCMCyOl2U9kz0jHkJIVEwCfR67r koia4vKtS812fumVTGc+LOc= =kJu6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ KMail Developers mailing list kmail@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail