[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Revert of not?
From:       Marc Mutz <mutz () kde ! org>
Date:       2002-09-10 13:43:47
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 10 September 2002 15:35, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 September 2002 22:56, david@bishop.dhs.org wrote:
<snip>
> > Only one person (IIRC) *asked* you to revert.  Every other reply,
> > after listing their reasons, said keep it.
>
> The person who asked me to revert it is listed as the maintainer in
> the about box. And the previous week it was requested that my cvs
> privs be removed for not following his instructions.

No, I asked that _failing any positive response_, your CVS right be 
reverted. I think the response was more positive than I had thought, 
what with you asking to revert or not. If only you weren't so stubborn 
about not splitting your patch....

Marc

-- 
If free-software authors lose the right to disclaim all warranties and
find themselves getting sued over the performance of the programs
they've written, they'll stop contributing free software to the world.
 -- Bruce Perens: Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]