[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Revert of not?
From:       Marc Mutz <mutz () kde ! org>
Date:       2002-09-10 13:25:53
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 10 September 2002 14:41, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 September 2002 22:27, Daniel Naber wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 September 2002 06:29, Don Sanders wrote:
> > > I wish that we could resolve our
> > > social conflicts as easily as cvs conflicts are.
> >
> > I think nobody has problems with big cleanups. The problem is to
> > add them *now*. That was the main point, wasn't it?
>
> Do you really think lack of pixmaps in the separate reader window
> popup menu, the only remaining bug found in my patch was enough of a
> reason to ask for it to be reverted from cvs?
<snip>

Don't spread FUD here.

The problem was
a. that you comitted against majority and maintainer decision[1]
b. that there was no consenus on the design of KMReaderMainWin.

Marc

[1] At that time, the patch was full of bugs.

-- 
If free-software authors lose the right to disclaim all warranties and
find themselves getting sued over the performance of the programs
they've written, they'll stop contributing free software to the world.
 -- Bruce Perens: Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]