[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Revert of not?
From:       Carsten Burghardt <cb () magic-shop ! de>
Date:       2002-09-08 15:59:41
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 08 September 2002 12:53, Don Sanders wrote:
> Would people like me to revert independent commands code or not?
>
> I'm not prepared to revert some of it and not other parts of it, it's
> an all or nothing decision.

I'd like the kmcommands to stay, I can't comment on the readerwin changes 
because I didn't look closely enough. But why is it an all-or-nothing thing?

> There are no outstanding bugs in it that I know of.
>
> I don't regard the missing icons in the context menu as a bug, and I
> don't regard the use of setTransferInProgress as being an
> unacceptable.
>
> I do believe there is at least one new bug fix in the code now
> regarding retrieval of multiple IMAP messages.
>
> Please decide.
>
> Don.
>
> _______________________________________________
> KMail Developers mailing list
> kmail@mail.kde.org
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

-- 
Regards,

Carsten Burghardt
_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]