[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: kmail usability with IMAP
From:       Michael =?iso-8859-1?q?H=E4ckel?= <haeckel () kde ! org>
Date:       2002-07-31 10:16:54
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 31 July 2002 11:58, Rob Kaper wrote:
>
> Well, there is no development roadmap for KMail on kmail.kde.org nor did I
> find a TODO or similar in CVS, which is likely to cause these
> misunderstandings.

I'm against announcing development plans as I don't like people to complain 
that the feature I promised to work on is still not there.

> The replies to the feature request were mostly "you don't need that" and

Well the start of the thread claimed that KMail is "half-usable" similar 
statements followed which partly are not true. Therefore I tried to explain 
why things are as they are for good reasons.

> one even said something along the lines of "but if you insist, use a
> different e-mail client" and I concluded that this was definitely not a
> consideration then.

fetchmail is not a mail client if you talk about that suggestion.

> My intent to work on it myself clearly indicates that I *did* consider the
> possibility that there will not be a complete rejection of the feature and
> that a lack of time and other priorities are indeed the only showstoppers.

I still don't understand what exactely you want to implement, sorry.

Regards,
Michael Häckel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9R7kae9KEPyN2R8URAizIAJwKQcnmtgX8GHZLcbhdPnHf7URt9ACfXreQ
H1xWg60kR9CD/FiK0fgMFsY=
=KqYt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]