Package: kmail Version: 1.4 (using KDE 3.0.1 ) Severity: normal Installed from: SuSE Compiler: gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE) OS: Linux (i686) release 2.4.18-4GB OS/Compiler notes: Kmail shows the gpg signature as an attachment,instead of verifying the signature, in this email: ------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: rune@trans4media.com Received: (qmail 16137 invoked by uid 560); 30 Jun 2002 16:16:50 -0000 Received: from current-users-owner-rune=t4m.com@netbsd.org by obelix.trans4media.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.241971 secs); 30 Jun 2002 16:16:50 -0000 Received: from mail.netbsd.org (155.53.1.253) by obelix.t4m.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2002 16:16:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 10923 invoked by uid 605); 30 Jun 2002 16:16:14 -0000 Delivered-To: current-users@netbsd.org Received: (qmail 10916 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2002 16:16:13 -0000 Received: from uriel.eclipsed.net (66.92.234.99) by mail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2002 16:16:13 -0000 Received: by uriel.eclipsed.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 406EA49701; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 12:16:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 12:16:11 -0400 From: gabriel rosenkoetter To: NetBSD-current Discussion List Subject: Re: 7 days and counting since my last rsync with new revisions.... Message-ID: <20020630161611.GJ908@uriel.eclipsed.net> Mail-Followup-To: NetBSD-current Discussion List References: <20020626164755.0E308AC@proven.weird.com> <873cv9kfls.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <20020626195500.01FA6AC@proven.weird.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNftq4k6NuHCGvy8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020626195500.01FA6AC@proven.weird.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: current-users-owner@netbsd.org Precedence: list Status: R X-Status: N --PNftq4k6NuHCGvy8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 03:55:00PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote: > Would more rsync mirrors (or at least one more here in Toronto) help to > spread the load out? Only if people actually use them. --=20 gabriel rosenkoetter gr@eclipsed.net --PNftq4k6NuHCGvy8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD) iD8DBQE9Hy7L9ehacAz5CRoRApFmAJoDozg2Y48/CNw3GX0oIe9vHS3CBgCdE/A/ Dz62bYNmh6e/NWLKnHJPMEM= =3Qgh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNftq4k6NuHCGvy8-- ----------------------- I'm not sure why this happens, but when content type is "Multipart/signed", shouldn't kmail verify the signature? (Submitted via bugs.kde.org) (Called from KBugReport dialog) (Complete bug history is available at http://bugs.kde.org/db/44/44554.html) _______________________________________________ KMail Developers mailing list kmail@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail