From kmail-devel  Sun Feb 03 23:30:43 2002
From: Waldo Bastian <bastian () kde ! org>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 23:30:43 +0000
To: kmail-devel
Subject: Re: $%^#%&^@%&@%
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=101277915515314

On Sunday 03 February 2002 11:37 am, Michael H=E4ckel wrote:
> On Sunday 03 February 2002 16:46:16, Johannes Liedtke wrote:
> > This really seems to be a great idea. Having just lost a huge kmailrc=
, I
> > would've really appreciated it to having only lost some settings and =
not
> > the complete filter set along with everything else... :(
>
> And why should be the chance to loose the ~/.kde/share/apps/kmail direc=
tory
> be lower than the chance to loose ~/.kde/share/config/kmailrc?

Because you write much more often to kmailrc (i guess several times per=20
session) then you would write to a seperate filterrc (only when you actua=
lly=20
change your filters).

I am not sure whether I like a single file per filter though.=20

Cheers,
Waldo
--=20
bastian@kde.org  |   SuSE Labs KDE Developer  |  bastian@suse.com

_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail