From kmail-devel  Sun Feb 03 22:50:54 2002
From: Rob Walker <rob () myinternetplace ! net>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 22:50:54 +0000
To: kmail-devel
Subject: Re: $%^#%&^@%&@%
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=101277684210439

On Sunday 03 February 2002 13:37, Michael H=E4ckel wrote:
> On Sunday 03 February 2002 16:46:16, Johannes Liedtke wrote:
> >
> > This really seems to be a great idea. Having just lost a huge kmailrc=
, I
> > would've really appreciated it to having only lost some settings and =
not
> > the complete filter set along with everything else... :(
>=20
> And why should be the chance to loose the ~/.kde/share/apps/kmail direc=
tory=20
be=20
> lower than the chance to loose ~/.kde/share/config/kmailrc?

Because kmailrc is only one file.  I realize that the kmail directory is =
only=20
one directory, and one accident can kill that as easy to kill one file. =20
However, applications generally open one file at a time for writing (like=
=20
kmail could for kmailrc or the kmail-filters file) instead of opening a=20
directory inode.

We are all very close to an application which opens and edits the kmailrc=
 file=20
a lot.  What application holds the directory inode open for a long period=
 of=20
time?

rob
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail