On Saturday 02 February 2002 12:09, Ingo Kl=F6cker wrote:
> On Saturday 02 February 2002 04:01, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > Ok, who's idea was it to remove filter rules when the folder doesn't
> > exist?
>
> Obviously not yours. ;-)
> So what should we do with broken filters? Just keep them and always bai=
l
> out with an error message if the rule matches but the target folder
> doesn't exist? Or ask the user on every KMail start for every broken
> filter if it should be deleted?

Yes. We should ask the user so that he can decide whether to keep it or t=
o=20
throw it away. That's better than silently throwing it away.

> > I just tested KMail with 4 folders instead of my usual 30 and
> > appearantly that was reason to throw away my filter settings for the
> > other 26. Thank you very much...
>
> Sorry about that. Are you sure that the filters are really lost? I gues=
s
> most of them are still in the kmailrc. Only the number of filters has
> been reduced and the first few broken filters have been overwritten by
> filters which are still valid.
>
> Regards,
> Ingo
> _______________________________________________
> kmail Developers mailing list
> kmail@mail.kde.org
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
--=20
Carsten Burghardt
email: cb@magic-shop.de
WWW: http://www.magic-shop.de
PGP: http://www.magic-shop.de/Carsten_Burghardt.asc

_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail