From kmail-devel Sat Feb 02 07:05:35 2002 From: Rob Walker Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 07:05:35 +0000 To: kmail-devel Subject: Re: Message size in kilobytes... X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=101263371310284 On Friday 01 February 2002 22:50, Brendan wrote: > >However, this whole thread started with the suggestion that we _remove= _ the > >field name from the row data, putting it at the top of the column only= =2E =20 What > >do you think of that suggestion? >=20 > I think it's a great suggestion...although, I may be a bit biased... > It would be like having "Name: " in front of every name in your message= =20 > list...The category heading is sufficient to convey this idea... I agree. I was thinking of this earlier in the day. It would be like pu= tting=20 Folder: in front of each of our folders in the folder list. However, I c= an=20 understand the desire to be able to have the automatic changing of the fi= eld=20 name in the column. What about putting the primary size as the column header, and then the=20 oddballs get their text string appended? One method would be do say "KB"= at=20 the top, and then in the size list, add B and MB as needed. That would=20 preclude having .754 KB for the 754 byte messages and .053 MB for the 53 = KB=20 messages. rob _______________________________________________ kmail Developers mailing list kmail@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail