[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Message size in kilobytes...
From:       Rob Walker <rob () myinternetplace ! net>
Date:       2002-02-02 0:15:44
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 01 February 2002 17:42, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Friday 01 February 2002 23:06, Rob Walker wrote:
> > I think I understand what you are saying, let me reiterate it to be
> > sure.  If we put KB in the column title, and then all of the values
> > in that column would be something like this:
> [...]
> > 6.5
> > 2.5MB
> > 1.6MB
> > 1.4
> [...]
> > is that what you were talking about?
> 
> Yup, but I wouldn't put KB in the column title but just put a 'KB' 
> after all the values that you write without a unit.

Ahh, thanks for the explanation.  I understand now.  What you are asking for 
isn't so terribly different from what we have right now in the 3.0beta, 
right?  If you don't have a reference, there is a screenshot of my trash 
folder at http://spurs.myinternetplace.net/~rob/kmail.screenshot.jpg .  Even 
more interesting, there is an email there which is only 723 Bytes, and it is 
shown with only the B character for the field type, instead of .723 KB.

However, this whole thread started with the suggestion that we _remove_ the 
field name from the row data, putting it at the top of the column only.  What 
do you think of that suggestion?

rob
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]