[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Problems sending encrypted messages
From:       Rob Walker <rob () myinternetplace ! net>
Date:       2002-02-01 1:31:26
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 31 January 2002 15:19, Chris Wiegand wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2002 12:03 pm, Rob Walker wrote:
> > Here I go displaying my lack of knowledge again....  How are gpg's
> > "untrusted keys" different from the pgp keys which Geheimnis displays as
> > "possibly valid keys"
> 
> They are the same. Geheimnis just uses different words. I call them 
"possibly 
> valid", which means the same thing as "untrusted", except that they could 
> *become* trusted if you sign them. Geheimnis lets you encrypt to them, it's 
> up the PGP/GPG to decline to let you if they want.

But somewhere else in this thread (which I have deleted, so am not going to 
quote) someone said that to allow this would mean that we have to treat gpg 
and pgp differently if we choose to allow the user to do this directly within 
kmail.

rob
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]