[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Feature request?
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2002-01-26 21:16:19
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 26 January 2002 20:47, Michael Häckel wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2002 18:18, JW wrote:
> > No, but helpless users who don't know C++ can always hope to
> > convince/sway/bribe the dictators to add desperately desired
> > features <G>
>
> If you now start a poll, what people want to see most in KMail, you
> probably get:
>
> 1. Merge it with KNode, KOrganizer, KArm, KPilot and Kandy and call
> the result KOutlook.
>
> 2. SMTP authentication.
>
> Well, 1. won't happen,

At least it won't be called KOutlook. But why shouldn't we put some of 
these programs together in a KOffice like shell? The only thing which 
we had to do is make a KPart out of KMail. But this wouldn't be such a 
bad idea. KMail could then still be used either as standalone 
application or as one of multiple plugins in the Kommunication shell or 
even as plugin in Konqueror (at least the KMComposer part).

> 2. is finally implemented since some months,
> but most people didn't realize that yet.

The reason for this is of course that it's not in a stable version.

Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8UxykGnR+RTDgudgRAkwcAJ478lGt2lmaCw3EOj3zhYdPMT3rQgCgh3mQ
0OxHc5zTVICiSCpjdShh3Ck=
=VvhC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]