[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: KMMsgDict slowness
From:       Michael =?iso-8859-1?q?H=E4ckel?= <haeckel () kde ! org>
Date:       2002-01-03 9:14:04
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 03 January 2002 06:09, Ronen Tzur wrote:
>
> It's not about the amount of work.  I think it's not right to divide this
> into two different steps, the first actually moving messages, and the
> second updating the dictionary.  Even more so when the overall design in
> KMFolder-related classes is to handle one message at a time.

Why not?

> My feeling is that if by optimizating the dictionary, the current design
> is still acceptible without having to apply further patches on it, then
> so be it.  And if and when this part of KMail gets redesigned, that would
> be the time to deal with issues like this.

I simply don't believe that. Even if KMail then would manage to remove 20 
messages per socond from a folder with 15000 messages that are still only 5 
messages per second, if the folder contains 60000 messages, as long the code 
is O(n^2).

Regards,
Michael Häckel
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]