-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 31 October 2001 00:43, Michael Brooks wrote:
> Very sorry about the delayed response to your message Ingo. I sent a
> reply on the 24th which I can now see never got through (thanks to
> Greg's involvement).

Oops, I didn't notice that Greg wasn't the original bug reporter.

> What I tried to say was:
>
> I had tried all of the things you suggested, except the lock-file
> issues. Setting locking to none brought down all the mail, and then
> setting it back to procmail lockfile (the original setting) left it
> in a useable state.
>
> However in the last few days, the locking settings have required
> toggling in this way a few times when local mail ceased to be
> collected again. I'm in a similar position as Greg with respect to
> the 'mail' group, and so having added myself to this group nothing
> has gone wrong yet. I shall see over the next day or two whether this
> has cured the problem.

Please keep me informed.

Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE74Gk4GnR+RTDgudgRAq3pAJ975n52B+s3guJiQRIAvmPtvrlQ+gCgk9Cn
pBQO72x08VVGr/K7ifHkEcw=3D
=3DXMqR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail