On Thursday 11 October 2001 19:44, Kurt Granroth wrote:
>
> AFAICT, those two functions are roughly the same one.  The only differe=
nce
> I can see is that 'take' does a 'readMsg' if the current message isn't
> already a message.  removeMsg doesn't do a readMsg.
>
> So question time: are both of those methods necessary?  Can't one of th=
em
> be removed if both do roughly the same things.

As far as I can see, they both do the same, besides that one of them retu=
rns=20
the message.
I assume removeMsg is much faster than take though, when it comes to remo=
ving=20
many messages.

Regards,
Michael H=E4ckel
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail