[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       klik-devel
Subject:    Re: [klik-devel] The future direction of klik development
From:       "Alexey Eremenko" <al4321 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-12-27 23:47:50
Message-ID: 7fac565a0612271547r7672297qfe93c8130f6e3b81 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 12/28/06, probono <probono@myrealbox.com> wrote:
> > fuse-devel (not provided with the standard 10.2 DVD,
> > not in free, not even in the boxed set)
> > compiling patched fuse-iso
> > compiling fakechroot
>
> Why do you think the user has to compile those?
> Wouldn't it be possible for the klik client to come bundled with these binaries?
> Would there then be another requirement for FUSE besides a recent kernel?
>

How stable are the binary interfaces ?
How stable is the FSH ?

I am not sure if single binary can run across RedHat, SUSE, Debian and Gentoo...
we can try - and run extensive testing - but providing cross-Linux
binaries is not easy.
Alternatively we can provide a script that compiles all the needed
stuff on the client's system (semi-)automatically. But I don't know if
this will be easier solution...

-Alexey Eremenko.
_______________________________________________
klik-devel mailing list
klik-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/klik-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]