---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jeff Licquia Date: Nov 3, 2006 6:17 PM Subject: [lsb-discuss] New appchk ready for evaluation To: lsb-discuss@lists.freestandards.org We'e discussed here and on the calls about enhancements to lsbappchk. The first iteration of those enhancement is now available. A standalone LSB-compliant binary is here: http://www.freestandards.org/~licquia/lsbappchk-new Source code is here, if you'd rather compile your own: http://bzr.freestandards.org/unofficial/newappchk-misc-test There are two new major features implemented in this version: - By default, appchk will not write a journal. Instead, it will write a text report detailing the problems it found, including embedded URL links to the Developer Network. Journal writing (exactly as before) can be turned on with -j. - It is possible to add whole directories containing libraries used by the application with the -D or --shared-libpath parameters. The directories can be specified using the same format as the PATH environment variable: one or more directories, separated by semicolons. All libraries found in those directories will be tested as if they had been specified with -L. The environment variable LSB_SHAREDLIBPATH is equivalent to -D on the command line. The report format should be considered a proposal, not a final decision, so if it doesn't work for you, please propose enhancements and/or alternatives. The same is true for the URLs in the report; they do not work yet, because I don't want to commit the LDN people to something without feedback from them. _______________________________________________ lsb-discuss mailing list lsb-discuss@lists.freestandards.org http://lists.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss ================================================= Forwarded by Alexey. 18.11.2006. This could help us in testing klik ? _______________________________________________ klik-devel mailing list klik-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/klik-devel