[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kismet-wireless
Subject:    RE: [KISMET] IPAQ for kismet - 32 megs or 64 megs?
From:       "Jerry Shenk" <jshenk () decommunications ! com>
Date:       2002-05-30 16:05:31
[Download RAW message or body]

I've got ministumbler - getting the dump data is exactly what I want.
Actually, just running tethereal would be ok.  The goal here is for network
auditing.  I want to be able to collect data inconspicously and then analyze
it off-site.

-----Original Message-----
From: alex medvedev [mailto:alexm@pycckue.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Wireless@Kismetwireless. Net
Subject: RE: [KISMET] IPAQ for kismet - 32 megs or 64 megs?


hallo,

On Thu, 30 May 2002, Jerry Shenk wrote:
> So what I'm hearing is that a 32 meg Ipaq is gonna be REAL tight if there
is
> not external storage.  Sounds like I'm gonna be better off putting Linux
on
> the 3850.  I had seen stuff on handhelds.org that seemed to indicate that
> the 3850 has some issues so I was gonna go for the 'sure thing' and put it
> on the 3650.....sounds like that might not be the best idea.

3850 works fine here -- did not see any problems, except qtopia starts up
upside down...
anyway, i think the handhelds should only detect and display info
about the networks, and not dump all the packets to a file (in my
opinion).
exactly what the ministumbler for win ce does.
packet collection can be done later with a laptop and a large hd.

-alexm



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]