[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: Konqueror Interview
From:       "Eugenia Loli-Queru" <eloli () hotmail ! com>
Date:       2001-08-31 22:51:34
[Download RAW message or body]


----- Original Message -----
From: "George Staikos" <staikos@kde.org>
To: <kfm-devel@kde.org>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: Konqueror Interview


> On Friday 31 August 2001 02:15, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
>
> > 7. I have to be a bit strict at this point and say that Konqueror takes
4-5
> > seconds to load in my dual 533 PC (and it is already object prelinked)
and
> > sometimes it even feels rather slow at places. Under AtheOS, where only
the
> > KHTML part is in place, the browser, just flies. Are there any
Galeon-like,
> > stripped down version of KHTML under development?
>
>    I just don't understand this.  I have two machines in constant use
here.
> One is a cel433, the other is dual PII-350.  Both of them load konqueror
in
> <= 2 seconds in web browsing mode.

I click the globe icon, which loads the web browser mode, and I have even
disabled the front page html that loads by default. If Konqueror is already
in my cache, it will take it about 2-3 secs to load, but if I had just
started X, it will take 4-5 secs. As I said, in my machine, all the binaries
for KDE 2.2 apps are objprelinked. Before using objprelinked binaries
Konqueror needed up to 6-7 secs to load.
I use a fast IBM IDE drive 30 GB (the one that Toms Hardware said that it is
the fastest IDE), ext2, 256 MB RAM, dual Celeron 533 and I have verified
this performance in my PC with both RedHat and Mandrake 8 distros.

Regards,
Eugenia

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]