[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: KHTMLPart API cleanup
From:       Simon Hausmann <hausmann () kde ! org>
Date:       2001-08-10 10:05:56
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 11:40:00AM +0200, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > My personal opinion is that I like the idea of a highly (if not almost)
> > source compatible 3.x. I like it a lot :) But in case of deprecated
> > methods I vote for allowing the cleanup, combined with documenting
> > what the replacement is. Maybe we should do/allow it only for the
> > obvious case. That is, only for situtations where the argument list
> > is compatible and it's only a matter of renaming the method name itself
> > in the caller code.
> 
> For the obvious case such a cleanup can be interpreted as "nitpicking" and 
> won't get much acceptance. 
> 
> I guess the only "clean" solution is to use a KDE_NO_COMPAT #define. 
 
Good idea!

Bye,
 Simon

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]