On Sunday 17 June 2001 11:42, Hans Meine wrote:
|   Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples@mtu-net.ru> writes:
|   > On Thursday 14 June 2001 21:00, Harri Porten wrote:
|   > |   > we came upon another idea, that's why i'm cc'ing kfm-devel,
|   > |   > how about integrating svg in khtml?
|   > |
|   > |   SVG has nothing to do with HTML if I am not mistaken. So I don't
|   > | see the sense of an integration. An SVG *KPart* would be the thing to
|   > | do IMO.
|   >
|   > You can embed image/svg into HTML page (as an OBJECT)
|   > AFAIK browser (KHTML here) should make placeholder inside box, and
|   > *render* SVG into this box.
|   > So, it is HTML-related, IMO.
|
|   But khtml does also not contain the code to render PNG/GIF. From the
|   users' POV, nobody will complain if HTML embedding works although a
|   cleaner implementation will seperate the code (f.e. kpart).

Yes, I agree with you.
The only difference will be from developer's point of view - DOM access to 
SVG is *nice to have* but of course is not mandatory.

-- 

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
http://kde2.newmail.ru/index_rus.html  (Russian)
Do you have Arial font installed? Just test it!
http://kde2.newmail.ru/font_test_arial.html