On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Reginald Stadlbauer wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> >On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, David Faure wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 12:25:11PM -0400, Navindra Umanee wrote:
> >> > David Faure <faure@kde.org> wrote:
> >> > > > I subscribed a couple of days ago, after I installed KDE 2.0 (snapshot)
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > I was wondering if you have the gui sorted out allready for konquorer, 
> >> > > No, not at all. We are open to every suggestion, and even more to people
> >> > > willing to help !
> >> > 
> >> > Konqueror displays my icons all squished over the text.  Is this a
> >> > known issue or just me?  Moving the icons does not move the associated
> >> > text.  I haven't updated since the change to mico-2.3.0.
> >> > 
> >> > screenshot: http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~navindra/tmp/squished.gif
> >> 
> >> Gosh !! No, it's just you :)))
> >> 
> >> Well, Reggie said he would replace the current KIconContainer with a QIconView-based
> >> one, so I don't think it's even worth trying to fix this.
> >
> >
> >BTW, Reggie, thanks to your highspeed-hacking-support-line (sorting, .. :)
> 
> ;-))
> 
> >I was able to hack a semi-working KIconContainer, based on QIconView.
> >However I was only able to use it with the current Qt snapshots as it
> >depends on some QMultiLineEdit changes IIRC.
> >Would it be possible to provide a QIconView which runs with Qt2.0.1?
> >Or is the next Qt version about to be released soon anyway?
> 
> No release date yet. To make it working with 2.0.x just comment out the lines
> 
>     setWordWrap( QMultiLineEdit::FixedWidthWrap | QMultiLineEdit::BreakWithinWords );
>     setWrapColumnOrWidth( item->iconView()->maxItemWidth() - ( item->iconView()->itemTextPos() == QIconView::Bottom ?
> 			  0 : item->iconRect().width() ) );
> around line 190 in qiconview.cpp. In-place renaming may not work perfectly then,
> but I can make this working for 2.0.1 later. It's just that I fly to Oslo
> tomorrow and will not have time to work on QIconView before next tuesday (when
> I come back). So for now it should be enough commending out these lines, I'll
> make a real working solution later then.

Great!

No need to hurry - the patch above already helps a lot :-))

Thanks a lot

Bye,
 Simon