[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    RE: Configurable treeview in konqueror
From:       Simon Hausmann <shaus () uermel ! Med ! Uni-Magdeburg ! DE>
Date:       1999-09-13 8:17:35
[Download RAW message or body]



On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, David Faure wrote:

> > 
> > Hmmm, or perhaps we should stay with one column for *this* 
> > treeview and
> > keep the kfmtreeview (the current one) as additional treeview 
> > available?
> 
> Oh I see what you mean (after reading 3 times) ;)
> Yes, I fully agree.
> Otherwise there is a huge mix between
> * a treeview starting at a given URL (like the current one, which 
> we can ask for any URL)
> * the configurable treeview, without details, a bit like the ms explorer
> one. Except that it's 100% configurable.
> 
> Yup, sounds good. Let's keep them two different things.
> But then we need a name for this configurable tree... :)

..Yes, and we need a final decision about the view-follows-view issue,
preferably *now* :-)

(in case of trouble I suggest the maintainer-takes-the-final-decision
approach :)

Bye,
 Simon

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]