From kfm-devel Sun Sep 12 15:12:25 1999 From: Simon Hausmann Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:12:25 +0000 To: kfm-devel Subject: Re: konquerer treeview X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kfm-devel&m=93714862009272 Hi, I have no doubt that we will make it as configurable/flexible as possible :-) Bye, Simon On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Magnus Ihse wrote: > Hi! > > I'm not subscribing to kde-kfm-devel, but I do read some of the posting to > the list (at least those pointed to from the News web page :-)). That's why > I'm writing to you instead of posting to the list. > > Anyway, you wrote: > > - the treeview. I like Torben's widget very much, but I think we might > > consider extending it a little bit. A pure file management treeview is > > ok, but IMHO we should re-organize the tree structure a little bit. I > > don't really want to copy that feature, but I actually always liked > > something like the well-known > > ... > > My Computer > > | > > +--Root > > | > > +usr > > +var > > ...... > > +--Trash > > | > > +--My Documents > > | > > +-- Mail > > ... > > > > ..structure . What do you think about discussion such a re-organisation? > > Or should we stay with the current treeview?" > > Basically, I agree with you that this is a nice structure. But how about - > in the "free" spirit of open source - letting the user decide? My > suggestion is that the treeview could - and should - be specified by the > user (which of course doesn't rule out including a sensible default). This > could easily be solved either with a text file, or perhaps even more > elegant, a directory with symlinks (like "Root" -> /, "Desktop" -> > "/home/john/Desktop" etc). This would have several benefits, e.g. it's > simple to get a "CD-R" -> /mnt/cdr or whatever devices you have on your > system, which you're likely to want to have accessible in the treeview. > > /Magnus >