From kfm-devel Wed Jul 21 21:21:47 1999 From: Simon Hausmann Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 21:21:47 +0000 To: kfm-devel Subject: Re: konqueror - session management / startup (fwd) X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kfm-devel&m=93264595012416 On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, David Faure wrote: > > It's just that I'd like to change/fix these things and I'd like to hear > > your opinion, also because you wrote the current konqueror session > > management code (konq_topwidget, ...) . > It's a different thing. konqy's SM makes it restart it the position it was closed > (number of windows, ...). Of course a lot still needs to be done on that (like > restoring all views inside the windows), but at least closing with 2 windows opened > should make it start with 2 windows opened the next time. Yep, this feature would still exist. And in addition I'd plan to make the sesion management save the current view profile in the sm-config -> this saves/restores the whole complete mainview(s), for free :-) (still needs fixes though, so that everything is stored in *one* group, but the core functionality works fine) However I don't really like konqueror starting up every time I fire up the whole KDE. That's why I would prefer the usual way of sm and konqy not in startkde. What do you think? > This has nothing to do with whether konqueror is in startkde or not. > I also vote for it not to be there, as I said on kfm-devel, and I suggest a link > to $HOME on the desktop, to fire up a konqy windows easily. I agree! > (But please don't make kfmclient fire up a new konqy each time one clicks on a > kdesktop icon ! konqy does eat some memory, no need to have 10 konqys around for > 10 windows). OTOH if it crashes then 10 windows go down.. Perhaps we can find a way in the middle? ;-) Every fifth window a new instance? Hmm, no, that's no real solution I guess. So we keep the old way of one single instances for kfmclient, right? Bye, Simon