[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: using unicode in khtml
From:       Waldo Bastian <bastian () ens ! ascom ! ch>
Date:       1999-05-18 10:01:00
[Download RAW message or body]

Lars Knoll wrote:
> > > You are right, we should make a check, but the chance of them appearing is
> > > small, because using characters in that range is not portable.
> >
> > It's just that we shouldn't crash on it.
> 
> Hmm... Do I have any other choice than agreeing to that???

Of course not :) 

I tried to point out that even if the chance is small to encounter them,
we still _will_ encounter them, for some sick reasons, and that it
shouldn't
confuse the hell out of the parser in that case.

(I could just imagine Mickeysoft is using that range quite extensively
for one of their great extensions *cough*)

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today       
http://www.kde.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]