[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: I'm back ! :)
From:       Simon Hausmann <tronical () gmx ! net>
Date:       1999-04-23 19:33:46
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 23 Apr 1999, David Faure wrote:

> Hi all.
> 
> I'm back from holidays.

Welcome back!

> Expect konqueror to be hacked again in the near future. :)

Great!!

> Before I left, I submitted here my idea of a libkonq, with common stuff for 
> kdesktop (yet to come) and konqueror.
> The general answer was "yes".
> But I don't think we agreed on where to put it.
> kdelibs/corba/konq, or kdebase/libkonq ?
> 
> I would prefer the second solution, and putting in it only common stuff for 
> kdesktop and konqueror (not the IDL generated code, as was suggested - a
> more generic solution, if any, has to be found).
> This would prevent kdelibs from growing even more, and I don't see why it
> would be a problem for packaging (I think that was Stephan's answer). Lots
> of modules already ship libs for common stuff among apps (kofficecore is
> just an example).

I don't know any details about the packaging problems but I like
kdebase/libkonq more than kdelibs/corba/libkonq . But if the packaging
problems force us to put it in kdelibs then I'd like kdelibs/libkonq :-)


Ciao,
  Simon

--    
Simon Hausmann       <hausmann@kde.org>
http://www.kde.org/  <tronical@gmx.net>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]